Research and Development Credits Within the Construction Industry

Nicholas L. Shires, CPA , Abby K. Sweers, CPA, Dannible & McKee, LLP

When taxpayers think of research and development (or R&D), most picture scientists in long white coats mixing liquids in a laboratory. However, the meaning of research and development in the tax world goes far beyond that. While the construction industry may not be the first that comes to mind when thinking about R&D, it certainly contains its fair share of qualified projects. For construction companies that take advantage of these R&D projects, changes are on the way.

Originally introduced as a temporary credit in the Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981 (ERTA), the R&D credit was made permanent in 2015 with the passing of the Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes (PATH) Act. For construction companies that qualify for the R&D credit, thousands of dollars in credits can be claimed on the associated income tax returns, depending on the level of qualified expenses. While the R&D credit has been around for several years, effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2021, as part of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) of 2017, the treatment of qualifying research expenses used in the credit are undergoing a major change.

Generally, for projects to qualify for the R&D credit, they must be technological in nature, and their application must be intended for use in developing a new or improved business component or process for the taxpayer. In addition, substantially all the activities of the research must be elements of a process of experimentation relating to a new or improved function, performance, reliability or quality. Within the construction industry, these research projects could include developing new processes that would reduce the time spent on site, creating new materials for use in projects with unique conditions, designing or improving tools and equipment that would lead to improved job efficiency and many more. For example, say a contractor is working on a road in an area that endures heavy snowfall. If they were to develop a new mix of materials (asphalt, concretes, etc.) that would experience less wear and tear from the snow, that would be considered R&D.

The qualifying research expenses can be broken down into two categories: (1) in-house research expenses and (2) contract research expenses. The in-house research expenses include wages paid to an employee for engaging in qualified research, amounts paid for materials and supplies used in the conduct of qualified research and any amounts paid to another person for the right to use a computer in the conduct of qualified research. Contract research expenses include 65 percent of any amount paid to another person, other than an employee, for qualified research.

As previously mentioned, the way that these R&D expenses are to be treated by the taxpayer is altered for tax years beginning after December 31, 2021. The TJCA amended Internal Revenue Code (IRC) § 174, which outlines the treatment of research and experimental expenditures. Previously, taxpayers were allowed to immediately deduct their qualifying research expenses in the year they were paid or incurred. Based on the amendments to IRC § 174 included in the TCJA, taxpayers must now capitalize these expenses and amortize them over five years.

For example, assume a taxpayer has $200,000 of qualified research expenses for the 2022 tax year. Prior to the TCJA amendments, the taxpayer could expense all $200,000 of these expenses in the year they were incurred. Under the new rules, the taxpayer must capitalize these expenses and would be entitled to an amortization expense of $20,000; $200,000 divided by 5 years and applying a midpoint to amortization to cut the first full year expense in half, as specifically stated in the code section.

Although these changes may appear to make the credit less lucrative, this should not deter taxpayers from pursuing the credit as it’s still very beneficial to those that qualify. The Internal Revenue Service has been known to look further into these credits when claimed by taxpayers, so it is important to contact your tax professional early to ensure that proper substantiation is being maintained throughout the process of each qualifying project.

Nicholas L. Shires, CPA, is the partner-in-charge of tax services and Abby K. Sweers, CPA, is a tax manager with Dannible & McKee, LLP, a public accounting firm with offices in Syracuse, Auburn, Binghamton and Schenectady, New York.  The firm has specialized in providing tax, audit, accounting and advisory services since its inception in 1978.  For more information on this topic, you may contact them at (315) 472-9127 or visit online at